Closing a company in Malaysia isn’t always a result of failure—it can also stem from strategic decisions, restructuring, or shifts in market direction.
When the time comes to dissolve a business, two formal options are available under Malaysian law: strike off vs winding up. Each follows its legal framework, involves different levels of complexity, and suits different business scenarios.
This guide outlines the key differences, helping company directors, shareholders, and business owners make informed decisions about the most suitable exit route.
Key Takeaways
- Businesses may close due to inactivity, insolvency, restructuring, compliance issues, or project completion.
- Voluntary strike off is a low-cost, administrative method to dissolve a dormant and debt-free company via SSM.
- Winding up is a formal liquidation process used to close a company with assets, liabilities, or insolvency, either voluntarily or by court order.
- Strike off is governed under Section 550 of the Companies Act 2016, while winding up follows both the Companies Act and Insolvency Act.
- Strike off is simpler and cheaper, while winding up involves higher legal and professional fees due to its structured process.
When It’s Time to Let Go: 6 Common Reasons for Business Closure
Businesses may choose to shut down for various strategic, operational, or financial reasons. Some of the most common include:
-
Business Inactivity or Dormancy
The company has ceased operations and is no longer actively generating revenue or engaging in trade.
-
Financial Difficulties or Insolvency
When a business can no longer meet its financial obligations, closure becomes necessary to protect stakeholders and minimise further liabilities.
-
Internal Disputes
Irreconcilable differences among shareholders or directors may lead to a decision to dissolve the business.
-
Restructuring or Rebranding
Parent companies may close subsidiaries as part of consolidation efforts, mergers, or to pivot towards a new business model.
-
Non-Compliance or Regulatory Issues
Continuous non-compliance with statutory requirements, such as filing annual returns or financial statements, can make closure a practical step to avoid outstanding penalties.
-
End of Project or Purpose
Companies set up for a specific, time-bound project may be struck off or wound up once the project is completed.
How Voluntary Strike Off Lets You Exit Smoothly
Voluntary strike off is a simplified, cost-effective way to dissolve a company that is no longer active. In Malaysia, it is governed under Section 550 of the Companies Act 2016 and overseen by the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM).
This method is best suited for companies that meet the following conditions:
- Dormant or inactive and has ceased business operations
- No outstanding liabilities or debts, including debts to government agencies
- Not involved in any legal proceedings or insolvency cases
- Has a clean compliance record with SSM (e.g., all annual returns and filings are up to date)
- Looking for a low-cost and straightforward closure with minimal legal steps
Key features of the strike off process include:
- Administrative in nature: no court involvement required
- Initiated by directors or shareholders: via a formal application to SSM
- Popular among SMEs and startups: especially those that ceased operations early
- Less complex than winding up: but all eligibility criteria must be met to avoid rejection or reinstatement risks
This route offers a formal, low-cost exit for companies seeking to close without the complications of liquidation.
Winding Up a Company in Malaysia: A Formal Closure Route
Winding up is a structured and legally binding process to close a company that still holds assets and liabilities or cannot pay its debts.
It involves the appointment of a liquidator to manage the company’s affairs, dispose of assets, settle debts, and ultimately distribute any remaining funds to shareholders before the company is dissolved.
Winding up is generally used when a company:
- Has outstanding debts, unsettled liabilities, or unresolved legal issues
- Needs to liquidate assets before closure
- Is insolvent or facing pressure from majority creditors
- Requires a formal process to manage claims, recover funds, and distribute remaining assets
- Is being closed under shareholder or creditor resolution or court intervention
Difference Between Voluntary and Compulsory Winding up
Under the Companies Act 2016 and Insolvency Act 1967, there are two main types of winding up:
Aspect |
Voluntary Winding Up | Compulsory Winding Up |
Initiated By | Members (shareholders) or creditors |
Creditors, shareholders, or other parties through court |
Company Status |
Usually solvent (members’) or insolvent (creditors’) | Typically insolvent |
Legal Process |
No court involvement; conducted via resolution and liquidator |
Requires court petition and order |
Liquidator Appointment | Appointed by members or creditors |
Appointed by the court |
Control Over Process |
Company retains some control initially | Court and liquidator take full control |
Cost & Duration | Moderate cost and timeline |
Higher cost and often longer due to legal procedures |
Common Use Cases |
Planned closure, restructuring, or clean exit |
Inability to pay debts, creditor disputes, legal enforcement |
Unlike strike off, winding up offers legal finality with more robust protection for creditors and stakeholders. It is commonly used in situations where the company’s closure cannot be handled through an administrative route due to its financial or legal complexity.
Legal Requirements & Steps to Close a Company in Malaysia
Before closing a company in Malaysia, it’s important to follow the correct legal procedures based on the company’s financial status and closure method.
The table below outlines the governing laws, authorities involved, and key steps required for both strike off and winding up processes.
Aspect |
Strike Off | Winding Up |
Legal Basis | Section 550, Companies Act 2016 |
Companies Act 2016 & Insolvency Act 1967 |
Regulating Authority |
Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM) | Court (Compulsory), Liquidator, SSM, Inland Revenue Board |
Initiation | Directors/shareholders submit application to SSM |
Members’/Creditors’ resolution or Court petition |
Key Steps |
|
|
Court Involvement |
No | Yes (only for compulsory winding up) |
Timeline | Approx. 6–12 months |
Varies; 1–2 years or more depending on complexity |
Nature |
Administrative |
Judicial (compulsory) or regulated (voluntary) |
Cost & Complexity: What to Expect When Closing Your Company
The method you choose to close your company can significantly affect the administrative workload, required expertise, and total expenses.
The following comparison outlines the key differences in cost, documentation, and professional involvement between strike off and winding up.
Aspect |
Strike Off |
Winding Up |
Cost |
|
|
Documentation Required |
Simple documents:
|
Extensive paperwork:
|
Professional Support |
|
|
Complexity Level |
|
|
Close Your Company in Malaysia with Amaze Advisory
With access to integrated corporate solutions and experienced professionals from a licensed secretarial services company, you can navigate the complexities of winding up a company in Malaysia or applying for a strike off with confidence and full compliance.
For Strike Off Applications | For Voluntary & Compulsory Winding Up |
|
|
We provide tailored support to ensure your company closure is handled legally, professionally, and efficiently.
Conclusion
Deciding between strike off and winding up depends on your company’s financial standing, legal obligations, and future plans.
While strike off offers a simpler, low-cost exit for clean and dormant companies, winding up provides a formal route for businesses dealing with debts, assets, or insolvency.
Taking the appropriate legal route helps ensure full compliance with Malaysian regulations while protecting directors from potential risks or liabilities. With the right support, you can close your company smoothly and focus on what comes next.
Contact Amaze Advisory—your trusted partner for closing a company in Malaysia through structured, compliant, and cost-effective solutions.